
if elected officials could be ejected from their positions post-election if their popularity declined. It provides a simple and straightforward path to selecting the highest-priority topics from a long list, which can result in highly effective retrospectives for your team. It was stated below by another participant. No extra work is needed to make this happen! ĭot voting is a useful agile retrospective voting technique to have in your arsenal.

For example, in Retrium, after a list of candidate topics is generated, the participants will be prompted to dot vote in private. In San Mateo County, CA 77. Some online tools support private dot voting out of the box. The Political Climate in La Honda, CA is Moderately liberal.
RETROSPECTIVE VOTING HOW TO
Second, how to overcome groupthink? When most teams dot vote, they have the entire team get up and cast their votes directly on the board. For example, if there are 25 candidate topics, you would give each person 5 dot votes (since the √ 25 = 5). This scales the number of dot votes as the number of candidate topics grow. įirst, how many agile dot votes should you give each participant? Here’s a rule of thumb: the number of agile dot votes to give each person is equal to the square root of the number of topics on the board (rounded up or down). This chapter examines whether and to what extent Brazilians can hold governments accountable by casting an economic vote.

But there are two subtle things to consider.

On the surface, a dot voting exercise seems simple.
